Welcome

We expect that projects with "Respect Durations" setting on will push effort that is not tracked against to the future.BUT this doesn't seem to be working in the system - why?We a ticket several days ago to Customer Support asking WHY the "Progress Tasks and Allocations" has the “Respect Durations” option selected for projects BUT it is not moving the allocation end date forward, the effort is just piling up against the date. Is it because we aren't using requested start date? Do we need to import that date for every project? Separate issue: WHY are % utilization going over 300%? We have made that the max  

I’m curious whether other customers have run into this same limitation with timesheet cutoff dates.Today, when the cutoff date is reached, users lose visibility to past timesheets entirely. From what we’ve seen, the setting does not just prevent editing — it also prevents users from viewing their previously submitted timesheets.Our use case is that we would still like users to be able to view past timesheets in read-only mode after the cutoff date, while continuing to prevent any edits. Submitted timesheets are effectively permanent records, and users often need to reference them for historical review, reconciliation, or support questions.The current behavior creates some friction because:users cannot reference their own submitted timesheet history support questions increase when users need prior-period details the business need is usually to restrict edits, not visibilityHas anyone else run into this? If so:how are you handling it today? have you found any workaround that allows read-

I have a workflow which sends an email when something happens. The From Address on the email appears in Outlook as:From: AdaptiveWork <system@clarizen.com> On Behalf Of ????????where  ???????? is the name of a user with ‘Integration User’ set in AdaptiveWork and it is an Admin user. This user is not the user set as the Default Workflow User in General Settings.I thought that Integration User was only used for determining permission to use the API, and not related to outgoing emails, where I would expect the default workflow user to be used. From a security point of view, I’m not happy with sending out the user name of an integration user to anyone receiving an email from a workflow (while understanding that “security through obscurity” should not be relied on).The fact that this user is an integration user may just be a coincidence or is it because the change which triggered the workflow was made via the API, but in any case I don’t want it sent out, but can’t work out where it i

URGENT please - A basic requirement in Project Management from our project managers, effort and cost breakdown vs time? Using Portfolio Financial Plan, how can we see the roll-up cost at parent task levels…A typical WBS is as follows:ProjectWork stream 1     Cpy A        Task A.1        Task A.2    Cpy B       Task B1       Task B2Work stream 2     Cpy C        Task C1        Task C2    Cpy B       Task B1       Task B2The leaf level is Task.How can I see the rolled-up effort and cost per month in the financial plan for Work Stream and Cpy level?In the Financial plan/report, we would like to see (for labour cost and effort)                           Mth1          Mth2   ...Workstream 1     £55            £65    Cpy A              £30            £30        Task A.1      £10            £5        Task A.2      £20            £25    Cpy B              £25           £35       Task B1        £5             £20       Task B2        £20           £15 The Financial Plan only show the Effort and

I wanted to see whether other customers have run into the same limitation with column sets and dependent structures.In our environment, we use dependency logic across structures/attributes so that when a user selects one value, the next field is filtered appropriately. This works as expected in configured screens, where users are guided to valid combinations.However, we’ve found that the same dependency logic does not appear to be enforced when users edit those fields through a column set. Instead, users can see and select all available values, even if they would normally be filtered out on the screen.This creates a few challenges for us:users can select invalid combinations data entry behavior is inconsistent between screens and column views we may need to disable column editing entirely for those attributes, which reduces flexibility and makes updates less efficientFrom an admin perspective, it would be very helpful if column sets respected the same dependency behavior that already e

Hi Team,In our organization we are onboarding users via Azure group integration.We add people in Azure group (User, resource) and after 24hours when integration runs then sync will trigger to Planview and the person gets activated/added to Planview Portfolio Prod instance.Now the challenge/gap over here is that there is no email invitation goes to users. The requirements is we want the invitation email/notification goes to new user with the portfolios link.Also is there a way to configure/edit the content of the email notification means can we customize the email body.Your early response is appreciated. 

We have added a custom text field and want to set up a validation or workflow rule to prevent duplicates at the parent task level. While we successfully implemented a duplicate-blocking rule for the client object using the findcustomer function, we noticed that an equivalent function is not available for the workitem object.Could someone assist us in finding a solution or suggest an alternative approach?

Hi Everyone,It it possible to configure Module View or Item Details View with panel showing Change History of selected item.Any responses are highly appreciated.Sincerely,Phat Nguyen

My Organization has active ProjectPlace access. However, ProjectPlace does not appear under Products in Planview Admin nor in the Planview.Me application switcher. Is there a supported way to register ProjectPlace as a product within Planview.Me so it appears alongside Portfolios in the navigation experience? We currently see Planview.Me, Planview.Me Labs, Portfolios and Planview Admin through the product switcher. Is there a supported way to expose all licensed products (including ProjectPlace ) directly in the top navigation ribbon rather than the application switcher?From where i can activae or add Project Place here, My org do have PP tenant and provisioned to my account . Just a silly thought, can we showup all the products horizontally on Black ribbon followed by Menu, rather showing up here in the Product switcher.

Hi Experts,I have a question around the “Apply Discounting” in Investment and Capacity Planning. When we create new scenario, there is the option of Apply Discounting and I can change it to say 50%. I want to plan a scenario, where I want to make it 50% of the demand cost and see if I can approve and thats why this modeling I need to perform.Can someone explain how this discounting works? I have a Financial SubTotals field (say Total Costs (WV)) with Apply Discounting enabled. 

I’m exploring the Capacity Planning Module and when I look at it the “demand” is zero across the board for everyone. Clearly, this is not correct. I’ve read through everything I could find, but I cannot find an answer. I have resources assigned to groups as primary. Resources have been assigned to tasks. The tasks have work assigned to them. Yet, demand is zero! Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you! 

Hi Everyone,I am configuring a Workflow rule for Project entity to automate actual end date to Contribution entity which associated to this project or CurrentObject. I guess to use function getlink but cannot find LinkEntity for first parameter.Any responses are higly appreciated.Sincerely,Phat Nguyen

Our team is in the early stages of moving from a more hierarchical, waterfall-style way of working to more of a product and agile mindset, and we’re using AgilePlace as part of that transition.I’d love to hear from others who have been through something similar. If you have any tips, lessons learned, or things you wish you had done differently, I’d really appreciate hearing them.A few questions we’re working through:How did you structure your board(s) as your team made the shift? Did you use one shared board or separate boards for different work types? How did you decide what work should be visible on the board? What helped your team adopt a more product-focused and agile way of working?Thanks so much in advance for any advice you’re willing to share!

Is it possible for admins to add Lifecycle Roles to Requests column sets (e.g., Exec Sponsor)?  It can be done for Work column sets, but I was told that it’s not available for Requests.

Has anyone else been experiencing performance issues with Planview Hub recently?  It may be coincidence, but when the UI changed our performance tanked with it.It takes several minutes for pages to load and the activity log times out all of the time.Checking to see if it is our instance or if others are seeing the same thing. 

I create a stacked chart in a report using the Created on Data field.  It shows as 2026-05, but I want it to say May in the chart.  I don’t see an option to change the format of this field.

Microsoft Teams is a central part of our Technology Stack - how do we integrate it into the Planview Portfolios?We originally deployed ProjectPlace but it has been forsaken because Teams has the document storage, better chat functionality, recording of meetings etc.  

We are running the Sciforma system. We are seeking more information on the risk module.  Can anyone direct me to resources?  

Summary of "Arrival-Departure Ratio (ADR) & Capacity Planning" Prompt  This prompt provides a comprehensive framework for analyzing work flow health and planning capacity using the Arrival-Departure Ratio (ADR) metric in Planview Viz. What It Does  This prompt guides you through a four-part analysis and planning exercise: Part 1: Historical Performance AnalysisCalculates how much work is arriving versus being completed each month (the ADR ratio) Breaks down the analysis separately for Features and Defects Identifies trends showing whether your team is keeping up with incoming work or falling behind Assesses the predictability and health of your delivery systemPart 2: Future Capacity PlanningRecommends how much team capacity should be reserved for defect work going forward Analyzes patterns in resolved defects to identify root causes Suggests technical debt initiatives to prevent recurring issues Helps you proactively allocate resources rather than reactively responding to problemsP